Bah, humbug.
That’s probably one of the most well-known lines in literary (and now, cinematic) history. Everybody immediately recognizes the curmudgeonly voice of Ebeneezer Scrooge as he pours cold water all over our Christmas spirit.
And his point is still made today by some, albeit in different words. It’s that the Christmas story just isn’t true. It’s rubbish. It’s made up. It’s all in our heads.
While now is not the time for a full-scale defense of the historicity of the Christmas story, Scrooge’s skepticism does prompt us to wonder whether we’ve gotten the story right. Are we telling the story that really was, or are we just telling the story that we want to tell? Are we just telling the story in our heads?
It might be useful, then, to reflect on a few common misconceptions about the Christmas story. The best way to validate the Christmas story to the Ebeneezer Scrooge’s out there is to make sure we’ve got it right ourselves. Here are five of them.
1. There Was a Star the Night Jesus Was Born
It’s difficult to find a nativity scene (or Christmas play) without a star over the manger. Indeed, this might be the quintessential symbol of the birth of Jesus.
The problem is there’s no indication the star hovered over the manger on the night Jesus was born. On the contrary, when the angels announced the birth of Jesus to the shepherds watching their flocks by night (Luke 2:8–11), they weren’t told to look for a star. They were told to look for something else: “And this will be a sign for you: you will find a baby wrapped in swaddling cloths and lying in a manger” (Luke 2:12).
The star was given not to the shepherds but to the Magi (Matt. 2:2), who appear to be visiting Jesus at a later time period. How much later is unclear, but the fact that Herod commands all the babies in the region younger than 2 years old to be killed suggests Jesus may have been in Bethlehem for some time.
2. There Were Three Wise Men
Speaking of the wise men, in both art and in song (“We Three Kings”) we get the undeniable impression there were three of them (also called “Magi”). The problem, however, is that this number is found nowhere in the biblical accounts.
Matthew simply tells us, “Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem” (Matt. 2:1).
The idea of three wise men likely came from the fact that Matthew mentions three gifts: gold, frankincense, and myrrh (Matt. 2:11).
3. There Was No Room for Them in the Inn
Another staple of modern nativity plays is the scene at the inn. Joseph and his wife, Mary—who is on the verge of giving birth—are cruelly turned away by the innkeeper who shows them no compassion.
Here is another popular misconception. The Bible never mentions an innkeeper. In fact, it’s possible there was never even an “inn” at all.
A recent study by Stephen Carlson makes the case (a compelling one, I think) that the Greek word normally translated as “inn” (καταλύματι) in Luke 2:7 is best translated as “place to stay.” So the passage isn’t saying there was no room in the inn, but rather there was no room for baby Jesus in the place they stayed. In what place were they staying? Carlson argues it was probably in the home of Joseph’s family in Bethlehem, perhaps in an adjacent guest room (which would have been small).
4. Jesus Was Born in a Barn or Stable
Since Joseph could find no spot in the inn, the reasoning goes, he must have been forced to stay in the stable. Indeed, every nativity scene ever created places Jesus in a barn of sorts.
But the text doesn’t say he was born in a barn. It only says Mary “laid in him in a manger” (Luke 2:7). Although that might seem to suggest a barn, it was common for mangers to be kept in the main room of village houses during this time period. Why? Because the animals were often housed just a few feet away in an adjacent room.
It seems likely, then, that Mary gave birth to Jesus while they were staying at the home of Joseph’s relatives in Bethlehem. But the room in which they stayed—likely a tight guest room or hastily added chamber—couldn’t accommodate a birth. So, Mary had to give birth in the larger family room and lay Jesus in the nearby manger.
5. Jesus Was Born on December 25
If we celebrate Jesus’s birthday on December 25, it’s logical to think this was the day on which he was born. But the precise date of Jesus’s birth is uncertain. A variety of options have been suggested throughout church history, including March 21, April 15, and May 20.
So how did December 25 become the date? It’s commonly thought Christians took over the pagan holiday of Sol Invictus (“Unconquered Sun”), which was on December 25. But there’s little evidence to back this up.
Instead it seems early Christians may have reasoned from the supposed date of Mary’s conception, which was thought to be March 25—the same day Jesus was thought to be crucified. Fast forward nine months and you land on December 25 for his birth.
These five misconceptions remind us that sometimes our picture of scriptural stories is shaped more by popular perceptions and modern retellings than by the text itself. But when we take a closer look at the biblical clues, a wonderful—and hopefully more accurate—picture emerges of what happened that night nearly 2,000 years ago.
And what happened that night still stands as one of the most monumental events in human history. God became a man and entered our dark, cold world to redeem a sinful people.
And that is a story that should transform our “Bah, humbug” into a hearty “Merry Christmas.”
Note: A version of this article originally appeared on The Gospel Coalition website.
Ron says
More than that – Matthew 2:11. The wise men saw Joseph, Mary and Jesus in a house.
Angus J says
This subject is also covered (and in greater detail) in Kenneth E Bailey’s book ‘Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes’ (SPCK 2008) chapters 1-4, and I thoroughly recommend the whole book if you don’t know about it already.
Trevor R Allin says
I would recommend chapter 1 of Kenneth Bailey’s “Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes”, which goes into more detail and reaches similar conclusions.
Lucille Gaither says
One more misconception is that Joseph is much older than Mary. Given that Mary might have been in her teens why is not possible that Joseph was in his teens, also. Is it because he is considered a righteous man? “…Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily…”
Trevor R Allin says
As regards Joseph’s age, you may wish to read section 7 of my article on “The Lord’s brothers and sisters”, here: http://livingwater-spain.com/brothers.pdf – “Was Joseph an old man who died shortly after marrying Mary?” (If Dr Kruger permits this link)
Victor says
Regarding point one: I think its more probable that Jesus and the family remained in Bethlehem up to the point of Jesus’ dedication in the temple (66 days later according to purification cycle- Leviticus 12:5), going back to Nazareth then returning to Bethlehem to stay for the celebration of Passover some time later, since we know it was a habit for them to go as a family (Luke 2:41), even though Exodus 23:17 only required the men to appear before the Lord God for the three national feasts. This harmonizes the best since even Herod understood quite some time had passed “according to the time he had ascertained from the magi” (Matthew 2:16). His discovery of Jesus being born in Bethlehem at the time in which Jesus was to be born was delayed by ignorance until the wise men appeared to tell him that Jesus had been king for almost two years.
Jim Pulfrey says
Best article I have read regarding the date of Jesus’s birth is at servantofmessiah.org where an Old Testament scholar traces it to John the Baptist’s conception. Great article on biblical truth of the story of His birth. Also look up Tim Challies’ Nativity or Christmas quiz for 15 other parts of the story that are not biblical, like did the angels sing, did Mary ride a donkey,etc.
Charles Nolan says
These misconceptions and the remedies give a wonderful roundness to the nurturing care, grace and providence of our heavenly Father to the birth story. Gratitude to those who study and ponder these things.
Gerhard says
The biggest misconception lies in the conception of Jesus by magic and that it was quite normal for young girls to claim that they had become pregnant by God through an act of magic. Surely they would have believed her in their troves as our ancestors knew no science and believed everything that looked like magic as the were so primitive in our minds and would go any length to have a romantic Disney story making a celebrity mother. Just Imagine reality In a country under military occupation. If you were told by an angel that you were to become pregnant outside marriage you would have known what’s up. You would have known that you were supposed to kill your self in shame or go in hiding and kill the child as not to become a single mum to live on social service support, which would in Mary’s time have been paid in stones :-(. Alternatively you would have been killed for witchcraft.
You would need the power of the shadow of the most high to protect you from your own folks and your self as much as a visit to your husband to be as not to be killed for infidelity or being made unclean by the enemy. So to make the word of god become flesh you would need to love the neighbour inside you, conceived by an act of God e.g. beyond your control and against all you would wish for in true obedience to Gods will, not humans, thus without sin.
If we understand the story without the Disney thinking it reveals to us the true power of the word of God to love thy neighbour when obeyed to by us to be able to turn an act of hate and oppression into a beacon of love and hope. Abracadabra just does not cut it.
Surely you may not want to publish this comment but you might at least have the curtesy to tell me why.
Mike Brugge says
Regarding “no room in the inn,” many years ago a pastor convinced me that a better translation would be “no room in that place,” meaning, he thought, the whole town of Bethlehem. Bethlehem is only six miles from Jerusalem and would have been filled as overflow housing for all the major festivals that brought pilgrims/tourists to Jerusalem. It would make sense that Jerusalem, and so all its suburbs, including Bethlehem, would be packed with people for Hanukkah, though to a lesser extent than for Passover or High Holy Days. The Census would compound the problem. This would also corroborate the December 25 date.